THE HOLY GITA
CHAPTER THREE
KARMA YOGA OR THE YOGA OF ACTION OR THE METHOD OF WORK
VERSE NUMBER 8
Text in Transliteration:
niyatam kuru karma tvam karma jyaayo hy akarmanah
sareerayaatraa ‘pi cha ten a prasiddyed akarmanah
Text in English:
Engage yourself in obligatory work; for action is superior
to inaction, and if inactive , even the mere maintenance of your body would not
be possible.
COMMENTARY BY SWAMI CHIDBHAVANANDA:
Bathing, eating, sleeping—activities such as these are
classified as nitya karma or
obligatory work; but if any one fails to perform it, then one incurs demerit. Eating,
for example is an obligatory work; but if any one fails to perform it, then one
incurs demerit. Eating, for example is an obligatory work. By regularly
nourishing oneself, one does not emerge as a better person, but if one neglects
one’s nourishment one become weak and emaciated, which is a demerit.
Bodily existence is required to achieve the several ideals
in life. Keeping the body fit is therefore accepted as an aid in making the
pilgrimage of life. If the body be not perfect, life gets frustrated. Action is
the means to maintain it well. Those who desire an abundant life ought to be fully
engaged in activities.
One ought not to be
satisfied with discharging the obligatory duties alone. For, they can only
maintain man in the excellences he has so far acquired. But there are yet other
excellences to acquire. New endeavours are the sure means to it. Crawling is a
necessary step in a baby’s life. But in remaining satisfied with it, the baby
cannot evolve. He has further to stand, walk and run. Even so man progresses
through new enterprises. There are those who hold that doing any new karma
amounts to the creation of an additional bondage. The seeming progress on one
side is nothing but bondage to karma on the other; is the view of these people.
They advocate the avoidance of the chimera of slavery to action. But this
negative position is untenable. Man can make endless ethical and spiritual
progress in life and at the same time remain untethered to karma.
COMMENTARY BY SWAMI SIVANANDA:
Niyatam Karma is
an obligatory duty which one is bound to perform. The non-performance of the
bounden duties causes demerit. The performance of the obligatory duties is not
a means for the attainment of a specific result. The performance does not cause
any merit.
Living itself involves several natural and unavoidable
actions which have to be performed by all. It is ignorance to say, “I can live
doing nothing”.
Comments by the blogger:
Here, in this sloka, the refrain, “Therefore Arjuna indulge
in war” occurs only indirectly. The Lord argues in favour of carrying out the
fundamentally basic actions like drinking, eating, sleeping and bathing as
nitya karma or ordained duty. By bathing or eating no new merit incurs, but if
one becomes indifferent to even these basic karma then high demerit would
ensue. Thus the Lord argues that whether one is willing to act or not, the very
fact of subsisting, if not high spiritual living, would become impossible for
human beings. Thus, calling them as ‘niyatam karma’ the Lord argues in favour
of karma as the very foundation of the bondage of the living human beings, and
thus leading up to the carrying out of Arjuna’s swatharma or the self-ordained duties as a kshatria or warrior king!
Samsaara means the constituents of illusion or maya, desire
of kama and action or karma. None can, even for a minute remain actionless or
free from the bondage of action. The trick is turning the self-ordained duties
into self-realising tool by carrying out them without expectation of the
fruits. A person must be like a public prosecutor. His duty is not somehow
fetch sentence of jail and punishment to the accused person, but to stack all
the points relevant and in his provice so and let in evidence, so that the
court can decide whether the accused is an innocent or a criminal needed to be
punished. In this province, the public prosecutor could not be said to be
having any iota of interest. His duty ends collecting all the evidence relevant
to the charges and accused persons and let in evidecnce. His arguments also
need not necessarily be in favour of arguing punishment somehow or other to be
given to the accused. He sits down completely satisfied after letting in
evidence and arguing the evidentiary points, leaving the judgment of the
accused in the safe hands of the Judge. If a criminal is punished, that should
not be seen as a win for the PP or when the criminal is set out as innocent or
the alleged crime against him having not been proved sufficiently beyond any
reasonable doubt, it could not be seen as a failure for the PP. The right kind
of PP, indeed, does not hesitate in letting in evidence that is, in his
judgment, basically in favour of the accused. The PP’ duty ends after letting
in evidence with regard to all the relevant facts and circumstances. Arjuna
must not judge the dos and don’ts of the matter. He must give battle as it has
come unsought to him who is a proven kshatria.
When even nitya karma could not be disregarded, the
swadharmic or self-ordained duties could never be ignored without incurring
sin.
No comments:
Post a Comment